Re: [boost] BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS can't be nested inside BOOST_PP_IF?

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-29 07:16:27

Paul Mensonides wrote:
>Tobias Schwinger:
>>Note: 
>>- BOOST_PP_IF does not get disabled
> 
> IF getting disabled doesn't matter here.  The entire ENUM_PARAMS invocation
> occurs on entry to IF--where IF is not get disabled.

Right, otherwise "BOOST_PP_CAT(f,BOOST_PP_CAT(o,o))" wouldn't work...

  #define BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(i) I must not post rubbish when in a hurry. 
  // ... ;-)

Thanks for correcting,

Tobias