|
Boost : |
From: Kevin Heifner (heifner_k_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-31 19:16:04
Jeff Garland wrote:
> Anyway, here's how I'd categorize the current set of compilers on the
> regression page:
>
> Supported;
> vc7.1
> vc8.x
> intel9_x
> cw9_4
> gcc3.x
> gcc4.x
> tru64cxx71-xx
>
> Deprecated:
> intel8_x
> tru64cxx65-xx
>
> Unsupported:
> borland 5_6_x
> cw8_x
> dmc
> gcc2.95.x
> sunpro
> vc6
> vc7
Even ACE is dropping support for vc6 and vc7 in the upcoming
version 5.5 along with KAI C++, Visual Age 5, CBuilderX.
>
> I know -- that's a pretty aggressive cut in supported compilers, but I think
> it's time to let boost developers focus on new libraries instead of porting.
Yes.
Jeff Garland wrote:
> For me it comes down to this. Boost is a project about the
future of C++, not
> the past. If we don't spend our energy working on the future
then, well, it
> will be like the past. We need to spend more time and energy
focusing on the
> future now...
Right let ACE worry about the past :)
KevinH
-- Kevin Heifner heifner @ ociweb.com http://heifner.blogspot.com Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) www.ociweb.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk