From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-01 20:23:53
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> I think it seriously confuses the whole business. When I started, I almost
>> tripped at the first hurdle because I didn't know what I wanted. I fear
>> others won't have been sold by your excellent 'Today I'm going to start
>> testing as I write, flossing my teeth ..." article.
>> There is also additional confusion with minimal test. Is it now looking so
>> simple that we don't need that (documented) either?
> I personally agree with you. Minimal facility is more light weight. Some
> people value this. Lets hear from the community.
FWIW I would like to use Minimal Test but unfortunately it doesnt define
BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE so I wound up faking all the test macros I needed myself. I
had to do something because Bjam wouldnt build anything boost using DJGPP gcc
on Windows, so I couldnt build test for that compiler, easily at least.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk