From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-03 07:57:54
Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>>I'm maybe an worrier, struggling with ADL invasions.
>>>But short names conflict.
>>true, that is why begin()/end() were abadened.
> I maybe failed persuasion. :-)
> But "mathematically", I believe ADL customization
> must be full name that emulates namespace.
> Well, I request tag-dispatching customization using
> class template partial specialization to next Boost.Ranges.
> Now that I really need tag-dispatching, I'm against ADL customization.
> I recall you said something like that. You were right.
> My current ATL/WTL CString range implementation code is horror.
> Will you add it to TODO list of next Boost.Ranges!
Can you elaborate on what exactly you would like to see?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk