Re: [boost] [Range] breaking update pending

From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-03 07:57:54

Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

>>>I'm maybe an worrier, struggling with ADL invasions.
>>>But short names conflict.
>>
>>
>>true, that is why begin()/end() were abadened.
> 
> 
> I maybe failed persuasion. :-)
> But "mathematically", I believe ADL customization
> must be full name that emulates namespace.
> 
> Well, I request tag-dispatching customization using
> class template partial specialization to next Boost.Ranges.
> Now that I really need tag-dispatching, I'm against ADL customization.
> I recall you said something like that. You were right.
> My current ATL/WTL CString range implementation code is horror.
> Will you add it to TODO list of next Boost.Ranges!

Can you elaborate on what exactly you would like to see?

-Thorsten