|
Boost : |
From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-07 23:19:11
"Loïc Joly" wrote:
Pavel Vozenilek a écrit :
>
> I think we may be talking about two different use cases for test system:
>
> * one is to run them overnight, do a complete coverage, record
> everything, recover after errors
>
> * other is quick and dirty tool to test recently changed
> code directly from IDE, without need to touch makefiles
> or whatever else.
I'd like to introduce yet another scenario for boost::test:
* once a bug has been found, it is possible to exercise the test case
that exhibits the bug, and this test case only, until the bug is corrected.
-------------
There could be unwanted interdependencies
between tests.
I use random sorting of the tests before run
with ability to specify the seed manually
in case of such problem.
(I happens only /very/ seldom I need it.)
/Pavel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk