Re: [boost] [Test] Link succeeds without BOOST_TEST_MAIN defined

From: Johan Nilsson (r.johan.nilsson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-08 02:38:59

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

[snip]

>>
>> Don't I need to define BOOST_TEST_MAIN in this case? Is this as
>> intended? I'm using the latest cvs and UTF as a static library.
>
> The only purpose of BOOST_TEST_MAIN for regular build is to define
> this init function. So obviously this is working.

For me, BOOST_TEST_MAIN sounds like one is defining a "main" function. I 
guess this relates to the naming issue we discussed earlier. I saw your 
posting about BOOST_TEST_MODULE, which sounds better.

// Johan