Re: [boost] [Test] Link succeeds without BOOST_TEST_MAIN defined

From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-08 11:13:28

| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental
| Sent: 08 February 2006 15:05
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: Re: [boost] [Test] Link succeeds without 
| BOOST_TEST_MAIN defined
| 
| > For me, BOOST_TEST_MAIN sounds like one is defining a 
| "main" function. I 
| > guess this relates to the naming issue we discussed 
| earlier. I saw your 
| > posting about BOOST_TEST_MODULE, which sounds better.
| 
| BOOST_TEST_MAIN mark one of the files as main in multifiles 
| test module. But 
| it does not affect the master test suite name. 
| BOOST_TEST_MODULE names 
| master test suite and also enforce BOOST_TEST_MAIN since only 
| one "main" 
| file could name the master test suite.

So would BOOST_TEST_MODULE be better named BOOST_TEST_MASTER_SUITE?

(And if no parameter provided, then it is called "Master Test Suite"

But if

BOOST_TEST_MASTER_SUITE "My Test Master Suite"

then called My Test Master Suite

Or am I still confused?

Paul

-- 
Paul A Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
Phone and SMS text [phone], Mobile and SMS text [phone]
mailto: pbristow_at_[hidden]  http://www.hetp.u-net.com/index.html
http://www.hetp.u-net.com/Paul%20A%20Bristow%20info.html