|
Boost : |
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-11 18:39:36
Hi Andrew,
> I'm tempted to weakly reject the incorporation into Boost pending this
> wrapper layer being written.
I think this discussion has gone too far. I have never talked about NOT
providing RAII. If you can re-read my previous posts, I have intention
to provide RAII *and* current approach in all classes before releasing
the library. So you *will* have have RAII without wrapper classes.
Cheers,
Ion
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk