|
Boost : |
From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-20 18:03:58
Is this the only place this will cause trouble?
A quick search shows basic_stringstream being in use in lexical case and
serialization.
- and in my own code :-((
Is there a problem here too?
Paul
PS I find the 'fixed' from Microsoft not really good enough - it involves
rebuilding a dll. (Considering the amount of trouble it is likely to
cause).
Why can't they provide a new ready-built dll?
I may get round to asking for this.
-- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB Phone and SMS text +44 1539 561830, Mobile and SMS text +44 7714 330204 mailto: pbristow_at_[hidden] http://www.hetp.u-net.com/index.html http://www.hetp.u-net.com/Paul%20A%20Bristow%20info.html | -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] | [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland | Sent: 18 February 2006 21:13 | To: boost_at_[hidden] | Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] [MSVC8] Memory leak in | operator<<(ptime) | | On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:12:16 -0500, Sean Huang wrote | | > Jeff, | > | > Thanks! I've tried the new version and the memory leak stopped | > I also did a search in data_time | > and found there are other places where basic_stringstream could be | > replaced with basic_ostringstream.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk