Re: [boost] [filesystem] gcc3.2.3/bcc regression fixes

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-22 18:51:15

Beman Dawes wrote:
> "Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
> news:dt306t$pp5$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> 
>>1. path.hpp
>>===========
>>
>>1.1. The BCC workaround is quite clean. If it doesn't make any sense to 
>>(statically) override the operator=(string_type) or the string() member 
>>functions of basic_path<...> it would be safe to use it as the default 
>>implementation, I figure.
>>
>>1.2. If VC7.0 can handle this kind of deduction it would be worth a try to 
>>see if bypassing can be avoided (I don't have this compiler installed).
>>

^^^ Did you consider these points?

>>3. fstream.hpp
>>==============
>>
>>The tweak makes things compile with some versions of the GCC parser, that 
>>mistake the open bracket of the explicit function template argument list 
>>for an operator (which seems to be the case with that gcc-3.2.3-linux 
>>regression).
>>

Yep, the failure is gone.

>>
>>OK to commit?
> 
> 
> Done. Thanks!
> 

You're welcome!

Regards,

Tobias