Re: [boost] is_enum and is_convertibleinterdependencies....BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-23 10:11:15

Richard Corden <richard.corden_at_[hidden]> writes:

> John Maddock wrote:
>> OK, I see the issue: there is a cyclic dependency, however all the other 
>> compilers for which we can implement is_abstract we also define 
>> BOOST_TT_HAS_CONFORMING_IS_CLASS_IMPLEMENTATION which neatly avoids the 
>> cyclic dependency.
>
> This works perfectly.  Thanks for the tip.

Didn't we decide that flags for conformance should always be in the
form of 

     BOOST_NO_some-conforming-c++-feature

so that unless something special is done, the assumption will be that
the compiler conforms?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com