Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review

From: Pavel Antokolsky aka Zigmar (zigmar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-28 02:52:23

On 2/27/06, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > named_shared_memory
> > named_mapped_file
> > named_heap_memory
> > etc.
>
> Some users have suggested more descriptive names:
>
> objects_in_shared_memory
> objects_in_mapped_file
> objects_in_heap_memory
> objects_in_user_memory
I don't exactly understand where plural form cames from. Isn't, for
example, current named_shared_object references _single_ shared memory
block?

--
Best regards,
Zigmar