Re: [boost] [bind] Borland 2006 patch

From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-28 07:42:01

John Maddock wrote:

> Just in case you hadn't realised: add_const< add_ref< T > > and
> add_ref< add_const< T > > should produce different results :-)

I took the ::type as read ;?)

Unless that is not what you are referring to, in which case I really do
need educating!

i.e: I assume the following are the same type (and not just equivalent)

typedef typename add_ref< add_const< T > >::type  ref_const_t;
typedef typename add_const< add_ref< T > >::type  const_ref_t;

-- 
AlisdairM