Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review

From: Pavel Antokolsky aka Zigmar (zigmar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-28 17:03:20

On 2/28/06, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I don't exactly understand where plural form cames from. Isn't, for
> > example, current named_shared_object references _single_ shared memory
> > block?
>
> Yes, but you create named/anonymous "objects" or "instances" of classes
> using construct<> functions. That's why they have proposed "objects".
I know, but I think even if the instance of this class allows creating
multiple objects of other types, doesn't  turn the object itself on
multiple objects. It just the same factory object that can "generate"
others.

--
Best regards,
Zigmar