Re: [boost] [multi_index] BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_CONST_MEM_FUN and membertemplate functions

From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-04 11:38:25

On 3/4/06, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hello Felipe,
>

[snip]

> Of course, count on this being committed asap. I've got
> a couple of questions, though:

Thanks,

>
> 1. Regardless of whether your compiler takes the expanded
> macro as containing a '>>' instead of two '>'s, it is my
> understanding that a *conformant* preprocessor shouldn't
> do this. Is this correct? (I'll add the blank, anyway.)

To be honest, I'm not a preprocessor expert, so I really dont know...

>
> 2. Do you say this particular use of const_mem_fun
> (macro problems aside) works for you? Which compiler
> and version of Boost (1.33.1,CVS) are you using?
> I'm a little surprised because accessing tuple::get
> with const_mem_fun is a very tricky issue, as discussed
> for instance in the following thread:

It worked allright here. I'm using the cvs version. My compiler is VC7.1

>
> http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2005/12/16087.php
>
> Joaquín M López Muñoz
> Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

best regards,
--
Felipe Magno de Almeida