From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-09 18:21:39
--- me22 <me22.ca_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Though that would suggest adding auto_array, which is something whose
> use shouldn't be encouraged, imho...
Could you please explain why?
What is your solution for the situation in my original posting? Here it is
again, this time with auto_array:
auto_array<int> result(new int[size]);
// do something to result
// if an exception is thrown result will be cleaned up
// code is still exception safe
Note that I don't want reference counting overhead (shared_array) or the
overhead associated with std::vector (two pointers instead of just one, default
construction on resize or lots of push_backs, deepcopy semantics).
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk