Re: [boost] [serialization][tru64cxx]assertionfailedatextendedtypeinfo.cpp

From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-14 06:13:25

Markus Schöpflin ha escrito:

> Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> > Now, rereading the document above, I realize that you're using
> > the -timplicit_local template instantiation option, which "instantiate templates
> > automatically, placing them in the output object with internal linkage", except
> > for manually instantiated templates. My question is, why are you
> > using such an option? Seems like the default -pt, as well as other options
> > which guarantee external linkage, like -tused, -tall, etc. should work
> > equally well. If you need to retain -timplicit_local for some reason, I
> > can try to adjust the Jamfile for test_serialization so as to inhibit
> > that option in this particular case.
>
> Yes, I am aware that the current template instantiation model is not a good
> choice, but IMO it's the best of the worst. :-(
>
> Let me explain.

[very precise explanation of the different instantiation options]

OK, you obvioualy know the stuff :) Thanks for the explanation.

> To make a long story short, I maybe should reconsider -pt or -tweak
> regardless of what I wrote above, because the test passes with both
> instantiation models.

I think globally changing to -pt is not worth the potential hassle: after all, it's
just one test that's having problems. What I can do is tweak my Jamfile
(you're using v1, right?) so as to use -pt in this particular case, only.
Would you be available to locally test such a Jamfile?

Thank you,

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo