From: Richard Newman (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-14 11:14:10
It has been a week since this question was posted. Is there a response
Bulygin, Sergey wrote:
> Let me come up with a question of curiosity.
> As [asio] formal review began on Dec'10 2005, there was a hope, that [asio] would become a part of Boost 1.34.
> Then it was taking weeks, but the review result is yet to be announced. Doubts arise of [asio] inclusion into Boost 1.35 already.
> Could the review manager or [asio] author give a clarification, what is the current state of [asio] formal review?
> What are the main reasons for formal review results delay?
> Are the issues raised in the formal review being addressed at that time? But according to the formal review process,
> this should happen right after the review completion.
> Sorry for impatience. :)
> Best Regards,
> Sergey Bulygin
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk