From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-16 08:44:09
> I am now no longer sure what is/is-not a random access iterator
> according to C++03, but supect the intent is to
> support-but-not-require output-iterator. Hopefully we can clear this
> up once and for all in the next standard.
Amen to that :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk