From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-16 10:53:53
Markus Schöpflin ha escrito:
> currently I think the most viable solution is to mark the failure as
> expected. I'm still in the progress of evaluating a switch to -pt, but this
> will take more time.
> Maybe you can put an explanation into the markup, something like: "This
> test fails because of limitations in the template instantiation model of
> the compiler used (-timplicit_local), which causes two static objects of
> the type
> > to be created. It could be made to pass by using another template
> instantiation model, but this is currently not feasible."
> Feel free to reword it to suit your taste... :-)
I've followed your advice and added an entry to the markup --tweaking
the Jamfile is probably beyond my bjam skills and, well, the markup note
really gives the user info about the problem rather than ducking it.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk