From: Peter Broadwell (peter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-15 15:42:43
Note the difference between the "definition" formulae of 3010/10000
and the suggested formulae using 3030/10000.
Perhaps this is on purpose, if not may explain why the tests done
later in this thread wich use the 3030/10000 version had troubles?
Paul A Bristow wrote:
> For C++, using numeric limits,
> So it is convenient instead to use the following formula which can be
> calculated at compile time:
> 2 + std::numeric_limits<double>::digits * 3010/10000;
> and I suggest that this should be:
> os << std::setprecision(2 + std::numeric_limits<double>::digits *
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk