From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-17 20:50:52
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in the follow up.
> On Mar 16, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:
>> Can you try the +m change on as many g++ versions as possible? I
>> may be
>> misremembering things. Or can you try the potentially safer
>> alternative of
>> adding "m"( *pw ) as an input and see whether this also works?
> Yes, that seems to work just fine too.
Added to CVS, and thanks.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk