From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-19 19:18:47
I thought you are off-line until Monday...? :)
--- Boris Gubenko <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> did you test your patch with aCC V3
> or only with aCC V6?
> If the
> latter is the case, I suggest, you conditionalize it with:
> #if __HP_aCC >= 60000
> I doubt, that boost.python compiles with aCC3, but if it does, your
> patch is likely to break it.
With aCC 06.06 compilation works both with and without my patch. However,
without the patch Boost.Python's cross-module feature will not work at runtime.
It seems highly unlikely to me that aCC3 works out of the box, and if it does
it probably needs the same type_id define. Therefore I checked in my one-line
patch as shown before.
BTW: Boost.Python works perfectly with aCC 06.06 after I figured out how to
compile Python correctly (-mt was missing), and with static_cast<> instead of
numeric_cast<>. I got some compilation errors with aCC 06.01, but that's not
important to me, at least, and clearly the bug is fixed already in the latest
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk