Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-22 04:46:52

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "[boost] [PING] [python] threading-related failures on Linux"
Previous message: Richard Corden: "Re: [boost] Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines"
In reply to: Richard Corden: "Re: [boost] Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines"
Next in thread: Andy Little: "[boost] [guidelines] [inspect] violation of min/max ( was "Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines")"
Reply: Andy Little: "[boost] [guidelines] [inspect] violation of min/max ( was "Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines")"
Reply: Richard Corden: "Re: [boost] Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines"

Richard Corden wrote:

[...]

> Can I ask what is the purpose of adding parenthesis to the qualified name?
>
> ADL should not take place for the qualified name? Do some compilers get
> this wrong?
>
> Is there another reason?

See http://www.boost.org/more/lib_guide.htm#Guidelines.

Markus

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "[boost] [PING] [python] threading-related failures on Linux"
Previous message: Richard Corden: "Re: [boost] Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines"
In reply to: Richard Corden: "Re: [boost] Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines"
Next in thread: Andy Little: "[boost] [guidelines] [inspect] violation of min/max ( was "Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines")"
Reply: Andy Little: "[boost] [guidelines] [inspect] violation of min/max ( was "Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines")"
Reply: Richard Corden: "Re: [boost] Boost.Test: violation of min/max guidelines"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk