From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-22 09:12:45
"Paul A Bristow" <pbristow_at_[hidden]> writes:
> It looks fine at 1600 x 1200 ;-)
> But I immediately switched to the user plain Times Roman font setting to be
> able to read it without eye strain.
> Which shows the impossibility of pleasing many of the people much of time.
Sure, the font choices aren't perfect for me either. But the overall
design is pleasing.
> I don't find the new Boost site appearance an real improvement over
> the previous plain vanilla version.
> I think we should stop obsessing about appearance and concentrate on content
> - which is already pretty good.
The appearance /is/ content: it communicates something about the
organization and the quality of its work. I happen to think the other
content on the Boost site could be improved a lot too :)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk