Re: [boost] interest on a geometry library

From: Theodore Papadopoulo (Theodore.Papadopoulo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-23 09:17:29

On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 11:58 +0000, Paul Giaccone wrote:
> Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> 
> >So I'll somewhat oppose to your proposal (and the following ones):
> >
> >N is the dimension. namespace notation is just notational not a
> >proposal.
> >
> >Euclidean::Point<N>
> >Euclidean::Line<N>           // not very different from projective
> >line ??
> >Euclidean::SemiLine<N>
> >
> One minor correction (with no criticism intended), before this becomes 
> reality:
> 
> Euclidean::HalfLine<N>
> 
> or
> 
> Euclidean::Ray<N>
> 
> would be the correct geometrical terms for "SemiLine".

No problem names were not meant to be normative and fortunately you
understood what I meant.

        Thank's for the correction.

        Theo.