From: Jason Hise (chaos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-25 15:03:44
Neal Becker wrote:
>Roland Schwarz wrote:
>>Neal Becker wrote:
>>>1. Generic data types instead of hard-coded 'double'
>>Hmm, generic? int's won't make any sense would they?
>>perhaps double or float but what else?
>I was thinking of any float-like type, but that's an interesting question.
>I'm afraid I don't have enough expertise to answer it - do any of these
>algorithms make sense for other numeric fields, (e.g., finite fields)?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk