From: Peder Holt (peder.holt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-26 03:32:36
On 3/24/06, Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Peder Holt wrote:
> > On 2/11/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >>> Peder Holt wrote:
> >>>> On 11/28/05, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 27, 2005, at 5:39 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> >>>>>> We should only be a few days away from a 1.33.1 release now
> >>>>>> anyway....?
> >>>>> Prerelease tarballs of 1.33.1 should be available by midweek, and the
> >>>>> full release will be on December 5.
> >>>>> Doug
> >>>> What is the status on this now? It would be nice if this made it in
> >>>> the 1.34 release...
> >>> I tested it an was all set for a check-in, but now we have nobody
> >>> running tests on vc6/7.0. I can't check it in without regression tests,
> >>> and now we're in feature freeze, so I guess this one doesn't make the cut.
> >> I'm prepared to start running vc6/vc7 tests, if that's what it takes.
> > Sorry for nagging about this, but I see that the regression tests for
> > VC6.5 and VC7.0 are up. I know we're in feature freeze, but from what
> > I understand much of the point of setting up the VC6.5 and VC7.0
> > regression tests again was to have a version of BOOST with the
> > remove_xxx hack in it. What should we do about it?
> I am ok with putting this in, despite feature freeze.
Thanks. I'll commit them to HEAD first, and if no new regressions pop
up (and nobody protests) I'll merge them to the release branch during
the coming week.
> Release Manager
> Thomas Witt
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk