Re: [boost] more on c2_function discussion

From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-26 04:52:29

Marcus Mendenhall wrote:
> Actually, if by this one means a complex function of a real  
> argument,  the extension is trivial since one can spline the real &  
> imaginary parts separately.

To my knowledge this is a useless thing. This will not yield an analytic 
function in general. Real and imaginary parts are are strongly dependent 
  one upon the other. This is what makes them analytic.

What really would make sense is to have 2 (or more dimensional) functions.

Roland