|
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-26 17:59:40
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:25:13 +0000 (UTC), george wrote
> > template<class point_rep, class duration_rep>
> > inline
> > void period<point_rep,duration_rep>::expand(const duration_rep& d)
> > {
> > begin_ = begin_ - d;
> > last_ = last_ + d;
> > }
> >
> > Jeff
>
> thanks Jeff,nice patch.
> but if I want period to get smaller?
> I have to go with a tmp period object?
> are you planing to add a method for this also?
>
> I don't want to play with boost::date_time and do it by myself
> becouse the source will be open to others and I want to use the
> 'standard' boost. this patch will be in 1.34?
Well, you could write a 'contract' method. However, contract is much more
dangerous in that there is the possibility of making an ill formed period.
I'd stick with the temporary object approach -- you can easily write this into
your own little functions that hide the details. Something like this:
date_period
contract(const date_period& dp, days len)
{
if (dp.length() < len) {
//handle errors here -- after contraction nothing is left...
}
return date_period(dp.start() + len, dp.end()-len);
}
In use:
date_period dp(....);
dp = contract(dp, days(2));
expand won't be in 1.34 b/c we've already had a feature freeze. For now you
could trivially write the expand as I'm suggesting above.
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk