|
Boost : |
From: Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-27 10:47:35
On 3/27/06, Pavol Droba <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > Thanks, that did the trick. I understand T -> T& isn't valid (although
> > > I don't like that), but why doesn't it automatically do T -> const T&?
> >
>
> Sorry, somehow I thought, that it is solved. The main reason why it works this way is the
> template instantiation process.
> const T& is more specific type then T& and so if T& matches the template signature, it is used.
But in this case it can't be used.
> As I mentioned in another post, this behaviour is implemented in the library intentionaly, since
> it disallows to pass temporary objects as the arguments on the certain places.
I understand, but isn't it possible to have both advantages?
For example, by adding a function that takes const T&?
Or should all functions (in all applications and libraries) return
const string instead of just string?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk