Re: [boost] another way to (not) build the libraries

From: Simon Carter (simon.carter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-29 07:38:54

Ulrich Eckhardt <doomster <at> knuut.de> writes:

> Anyhow, what I wonder is whether this is not a way that should be supported 
> actively. In our case, it significantly reduced the adoption barrier for the 
> threading lib, it also makes bjam use unnecessary 

I'd be very keen to seen this form of usage documented