Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-29 18:05:04

David Abrahams wrote:

>> On top of that there could be the friendlier: make_auto_ptr,
>> make_shared_ptr, etc...
> None of that is particularly friendly compared to new_<T>(a,b,c)... as
> long if we have the appropriate non-explicit converting constructor
> from auto_ptr rvalues in all the other smart pointers.

make_shared_ptr<T>( a, b, c ) (or however we end up calling it) still has
the advantage of being able to fold the two allocations into one.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at