From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-04 08:10:07
On 4/4/06, Christopher Kohlhoff <chris_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> No problem, I'll change it as soon as sourceforge cvs is working again.
> However, I do wonder if it's STLPort's checked iterator support that
> has the bug. 18.104.22.168/3 specifies the effects of clear(), and says:
I dont know very much to confirm, but really looks like a bug in
STLPort checked iterator.
> Invalidates only the iterators and references to the erased elements.
> To me this means that the iterator returned by end() is not invalidated
> by the call to clear(), since that iterator does not correspond to any
> element that can be erased. Perhaps there is another part of the
> standard that says otherwise?
I think you're right. But, IMO, it is a very trivial workaround, anyway...
Thank you very much,
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida