From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-11 04:15:52
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>at the moment, results for borland_5_8_1 and borland_5_8_2b compiler
>>on RC_1_34_0 branch are pretty bad. See:
>>Unless a user of borland can step forward and look into those
>>failures, we'll essentially have no support for those toolsets in
>>1.34. Any volunteers?
> I know there are at least two of us actively looking into the issues
> now. Unforunately I was effectively offline last week in Berlin, so am
> only catching up now.
I am also looking into this and have posted a few patches lately to the
list. So far only Robert Ramey took notice though.
> 0x582 is a bit strange. Basically, Borland have made the next patch of
> their compiler available to myself and Aleksey as the patch and Boost
> 1.34 will probably ship around the same time. Boost regressions are
> one of the focusses of this patch, and it gives me much better results
> locally. I have just checked out the release branch (vs. the mainline
> I have been working with) and should have some more patches ready to
> roll tonight.
Alisdair, the last time I looked borland.hpp wasn't updated for 5.8.2 .
I refrained from posting a patch because I believe you have more
extensive changes to submit than I have.
> So far, I have not been applying patches directly, but posting them to
> the list. Some of those patches can take a while to be applied, and I
> think a couple went missing. Is there anything I can do to speed up
> applying patches?
Exactly my point of view. Maybe some of the most experienced Boosters
could step in and review our patches if library authors aren't available...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk