From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-11 05:43:28
"Marcin Kalicinski" <kalita_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Property tree library revision 5 (review version) is now in the boost vault.
> Documentation can be viewed online at http://kaalus.atspace.com/ptree
What is the rationale for using the word "property" here?
Why is this data structure not a more generic tree? It seems as
though forcing the data on a tree node to be a specialization of
basic_string is needlessly limiting.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk