Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-11 05:43:28

"Marcin Kalicinski" <kalita_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Property tree library revision 5 (review version) is now in the boost vault.
> Documentation can be viewed online at

What is the rationale for using the word "property" here?

Why is this data structure not a more generic tree? It seems as
though forcing the data on a tree node to be a specialization of
basic_string is needlessly limiting.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at