Re: [boost] Report from Berlin C++ Standards Committee meeting

From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-13 16:16:57

Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> be templated.  I think the syntax should be
>>>>
>>>>   auto(x){ x->first < 0 }
>>> where is "return" ?
>> Good observation.  Nowhere.  Have you got a problem with that?  Also
>> no semicolon.
> 
> it's not function body, then. It's an expression. C'mon, I do not think that 
> this could be honestly called "lambda".

It could be an expression or a statement-list, why couldn't it be called
lambda? I would say most lambda expressions would be simple expressions,
in which "return" is just unnecessary clutter. If they are too
complicated they should be moved out to a named function anyway, IMO..

-- 
Daniel Wallin