From: Steve Hutton (shutton_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-15 04:07:00
On 2006-04-14, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Maciej Sobczak" <prog_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> What exactly are you planning on adding before the Boost
>> At least one backend allowing to target what is traditionally considered
>> to be a Microsoft part of the world. ODBC backend would be most generic...
> Looking at the soci.h header, it also seems the code needs to be boostified.
> And to find a name that is not tied to a particular vendor. How about
Personally I was thinking Boost.Sql, partially to leave room for other
libraries which take a less sql centric approach.
> While it is fun to dream about an eventual submission to the standards
> committee, the first step is to get the library ready for a Boost formal
> review. The review spotlights areas needing additional work, and the wide
> scrutiny and exposure of Boost libraries gives the LWG confidence that a
> potential library is actually useful.
Yes, one step at a time :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk