From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-20 16:30:33
"Thorsten Ottosen" <thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>>>5. CLA parser is a joke. It's unacceptable any way you present it.
>>>Please be more detailed.
>> Compare it even with the one in PO (which I also consider not flexible
> I was trying to get you to put something concrete on the table, so I as
> a review manager (and everybody else) has a chance of understanding you.
What do you want me to present? Set of formats supported by PO CLA parser
vs. set of formats supported by this submission? Believe me the relation
would be at least 50:1. Just look on both libraries.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk