From: Jorge Lodos (lodos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 10:53:53
> I think it is quite hard to require that a parser for config
> file X must exists for us to accept the library. It puts a
> great deal of burden on the library author. Our focus should
> be on the general core interface of the library s.t. we get a
> flexible solution that can be useful in many areas.
The requisites I meant were the ones enumerated, namely
1. The ability to load/save properties independently, not as a whole.
2. A documented (for library extensibility) parser interface allowing parser
developers to accomplish (1).
Sorry if this was not clear enough.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk