From: Jorge Lodos (lodos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 13:04:56
> > What I think PT must have that serialization library is not
> meant to is:
> Sorry. I am not sure what you mean: does the submission has
> these requisite already or not?
> > 1. The ability to load/save properties independently, not
> as a whole.
> What do you mean by that? Load should be separate from save?
I mean that only one property (which of course could contain others) could
be loaded (or saved) at a time. Not the whole tree. For instance, if my tree
corresponds to a windows registry key, it is desirable to load or save a
single value without loading or saving all the values in the key.
> > 2. A documented (for library extensibility) parser
> interface allowing
> > parser developers to accomplish (1).
> How is this different from Serialization library?
The difference is support for (1).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk