From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-22 06:19:24
Darren Cook wrote:
>> * Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> Ideally I think it should be merged into the Boost Serialization library
> as additional format options (i.e. in addition to the current binary,
> text and xml formats, add easy-to-read-xml, json and ini files).
> If, as I suspect, that is technical not feasible, then I vote Yes.
I have some problems parsing that statement. Do you only vote yes *iff*
this is bundled with serialization?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk