Boost logo

Boost :

From: Matt Doyle (mdoyle_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-25 15:08:06


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Fernando Cacciola
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [SoC] Payment handling?
>
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> > Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> >> On 4/25/06, Fernando Cacciola
> <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Matt Doyle wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Boost could refuse payment,
> >>>
> >>> Donating seems better to me.
> >>
> >>
> >> IMO, it should go to the mentor. As is the intent of google.
> >
> > Agreed. The mentor puts some extra effort into this and the
> money is
> > well-deserved.
> >
> Me too.. this is what I initally said.
> I was comparing donating to letting Google keep it.
>
> Still, deciding what's the best to do is half the issue here.
> How to do is is also important, specially because of the
> responsability put on those willing to administer the payments.
> As I said, unless I got it wrong, Google will pay "Boost",
> not each individual mentor.
>
> Fernando Cacciola
I'm not disagreeing that the mentor deserves it. What I was thinking
about was more, how could Google possibly pay Boost? Boost is not an
entity. The only other option I can see is to name an individual (or an
entity) to accept it for Boost.

Or, just donate it...

>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

Scanned by McAfee GroupShield {X3BTB534}


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk