From: Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-26 10:53:26
On 4/26/06, Jose <jmalv04_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 4/26/06, Paul A Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > to escape from the async-ness which doesn't seem important in the bigger
> > picture into which this library promises to fit in future?
> boost::asio big contribution is in async handling ( networking now and file
> i/o in the future) so I think is hard to find a better, shorter and more
> precise name
Why should it be shorter?
I think async_io is both better and more precise as it's immediately
clear what the a stands for.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk