Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-26 12:11:36

Next message: Boris Gubenko: "[boost] is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?"
Previous message: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."

Beman Dawes wrote:

>I agree. But if the plan is to also provide synchronous I/O, then the name
>should be broadened, IMO.
>
>
Or left at Asio, which could stand for "Asynchronous and Synchronous I/O".

Sebastian Redl

Next message: Boris Gubenko: "[boost] is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?"
Previous message: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk