From: Phil Nash (phil.nash.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 07:46:41
Christopher Kohlhoff wrote:
> Hi James,
> --- James McCartney <asynth_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> This library's name should be changed as it will lead to confusion.
>> There is already an audio i/o library called ASIO which has been in
>> use for years in audio applications and supported by many software
>> vendors and hardware manufacturers.
> I don't think it will lead to confusion.
I have to admit, when I returned to boost after some time away and saw a
lot of discussion about the Asio library, I did wonder why boost was
getting involved in audio!
Of course, once I got around to reading the content of the postings it
cleared things up - but even if I suspected that Boost's Asio was not
the same as Steinberg's, I didn't realise that it was to do with Asynch
(or Synch) IO until I looked into it more closely.
It's more for the latter reason that I too would welcome a (slight)
change to the name (remotely possible trademark issues aside).
From the current suggestions I like async_io, although I see that it
could be a problem if a synchronouse version was implemented.
I like the ambiguity of the S, which some have exploited to mean: Aynch/
Synch IO. Perhaps we could keep the letters, but stress the grouping
like this: as_io ?
Just my thoughts. I like the library and would to hate to think it got
overlooked by some because the name doesn't give too many clues as to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk