Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 11:31:26

Next message: James McCartney: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
Previous message: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] 1.34 schedule status [was: Re: is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?]"
In reply to: Nicola Musatti: "[boost] Help! Which compilers use _RWSTD_VER and __SGI_STL_PORT?"

"Nicola Musatti"

> I think I found a workaround for the pool problem with BCB2006, which
> broke several serialization tests. However in order to be sure not to
> break other compilers I need to know if the macros above, _RWSTD_VER and
> __SGI_STL_PORT, are Borland specific or no. Any idea?
>
Only __BORLANDC__ is.
/Pavel

Next message: James McCartney: "Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO."
Previous message: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] 1.34 schedule status [was: Re: is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?]"
In reply to: Nicola Musatti: "[boost] Help! Which compilers use _RWSTD_VER and __SGI_STL_PORT?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk