|
Boost : |
From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-28 04:32:53
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>
>>> Can you try this modification (also in CVS HEAD) that would tell us
>>> more about what's going on:
>> Here are the results for gcc 4.1.0 on Linux and Tru64:
>>
>> visitor::operator()( T ): PFiiiiE
>> visitor::operator()( T ): N5boost3_bi5valueIiEE
>> visitor::operator()( T ): N5boost3_bi5valueIiEE
>> bind_visit_test.cpp(64): test 'vis.hash == 34' failed in function
>> 'int main()' 1 error detected.
>>
>> And here is the result for cxx on Tru64:
>>
>> visitor::operator()( T ): int (*)(int, int, int)
>> visitor::operator()( T ): boost::_bi::value<int>
>> visitor::operator()( T ): boost::_bi::value<int>
>> bind_visit_test.cpp(64): test 'vis.hash == 34' failed in function
>> '(unknown)' 1 error detected.
>>
>> HTH, Markus
>
> It does, thanks. This is a bug in boost::bind that is exposed by two-phase
> lookup. I fixed it in CVS HEAD. Not sure yet what to do with the 1.34 branch
> as changes in boost::bind have a potential to break other things.
Great, this seems to have fixed a long standing problem with the signals
library as well which previously has been rated as a compiler bug. :-)
And thanks for the merge.
Markus
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk