Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO.

From: Cory Nelson (phrosty_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-28 13:33:50

On 4/28/06, Paul A Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> | [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Silex
> | Sent: 26 April 2006 16:38
> | To: boost_at_[hidden]
> | Subject: Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO.
> |
> | libio ?
> | ionet ?
> |
> | :)
> |
> | On 4/26/06, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> | > But if the plan is to also provide synchronous I/O,
> | then the name should be broadened, IMO.
>
> fario ?
>
> iofar?
>
> (io to places not so local
> and yet not covered by filesystem  - perhaps networked).

i see nothing wrong with asio but assuming that is out the door what's
wrong with something simple like boost.io?

>
> Paul
>
> --
> Paul A Bristow
> Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
> Phone and SMS text [phone], Mobile and SMS text [phone]
> mailto: pbristow_at_[hidden]  http://www.hetp.u-net.com/index.html
> http://www.hetp.u-net.com/Paul%20A%20Bristow%20info.html
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

--
Cory Nelson
http://www.int64.org