From: Matias Capeletto (matias.capeletto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-02 02:37:00
Do anyone know if it is better to send the application as quick as possible?
I am working in the docs, and i want to give a great impression to the
SoC judges. I have to spend two or three days more to get it right.
And next I was planning to upload a quickbook generated web page to
heard the list voices... In that way, i will have the weekend to
improve it with the feedback i get.
Is this ok? Or I have to send it asap?
Sorry to post this here, but i have not find the time to get in the
other list... I am starting to get very used to quickbook and i like
the results i get. Is there a highlighting grammar construct for
quickbook syntax? I wan to see it full color so i don't get so many
error when i compile it. I have been investigating and i think i can
managed to create such grammar file for Kate ( The K advance text
editor of KDE, that is a standard plug in of Konqueror ) when i finish
my SoC application. Is anyone interested in such tool?
Matias, hopefully building more than MISC docs in the next three months...
On 5/1/06, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Matias Capeletto <matias.capeletto_at_[hidden]>
> Fecha: Lunes, Mayo 1, 2006 6:59 am
> Asunto: Re: [boost] [SoC] Specialized containers with Boost.MultiIndex
> > I am finishing my application to the (M)ulti (I)ndex (S)pecialized
> > (C)ontainers (from now on MISC, do you like it?) for the SoC.
> > I am constructing a quickbook with a formal proposal, interface
> > design, project plan and personal information. I want to share it
> > the list. I will really appreciate some feedback before sending the
> > application, specially from Joaquin. Can i post it here when it is
> > mature enough?
> Sure, I'm eager to read it.
> Joaquín M López Muñoz
> Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost